16 Meaningless Market Phrases – #15

“Take a wait-and-see approach”

General: A perennial favorite.

When to use it: Any time you don’t have the balls to make any predictions or recommendations whatsoever.

Why it’s smart-sounding: It sounds prudent and cautious. It sounds appropriately skeptical. It plays to the viewer’s sense that, somehow, things are more uncertain now than they usually are. (Absurd–the future is always uncertain.) It sounds like there’s a specific event or events that you’re waiting for that will suddenly turn you into the Donald Trump of Conviction, instead of suggesting that you’re just perpetually wishy-washy. But it doesn’t actually specify what this event or events are.

Why it’s meaningless: It means nothing. How long are you going to wait? What are you waiting for? Why, when what you’re waiting for finally arrives, won’t everyone else see it at the same time and bid prices up or down? Why will the future be any less uncertain tomorrow, or next week, or next year, or whenever it is you’re planning to “wait-and-see” until? What are you waiting for?

 

16 Meaningless Market Phrases – #1

“The easy money has been made”

"The easy money has been made"

When to use it: When you are asked whether investors should buy a market or stock that has already gone up a lot.

Why it’s smart-sounding: It implies wise, prudent caution. It implies that you bought or recommended the stock a long time ago, before the easy money was made (and are therefore smart). It suggests that there might be further upside but that there might also be future downside, because the stock is “due for a correction” (another smart-sounding meaningless phrase that you can use all the time). It does not commit you to any specific recommendation or prediction. It protects you from all possible outcomes: If the stock drops, you can say “as I said…” If the stock goes up, you can say “as I said…”

Why it’s meaningless: It’s a statement of the obvious. It’s a description of what has happened, not what will happen. It requires no special insights or powers of analysis. It tells you nothing that you don’t already know. Also, it’s not true: The money that has been made was likely in no way “easy.” Buying stocks that are rising steadily is a lot “easier” than buying stocks that the market has abandoned for dead (because everyone thinks you’re stupid to buy stocks that no one else wants to buy.)

 

16 Meaningless Market Phrases That Will Make You Sound Smart On TV

If you watch financial television all day, like we do, you’ll quickly notice something. A handful of guests have the confidence and guts to speak actual English and say what they mean. These guests are invaluable: Their opinions are backed up by logic and conviction, they state them clearly, and they make specific statements and recommendations that normal viewers can understand. Even when these guests are wrong, their clarity helps you refine your own opinions–even if you disagree.

Of course, these guests also expose themselves to all sorts of potential ridicule–if the predictions or statements they make turn out to be wrong.

And that’s why the vast majority of guests speak a language unique to financial television.

This language consists of market phrases that you hear all the time that sound vaguely intelligent but actually don’t mean anything.

The phrases don’t sound like they don’t mean anything, of course: On the contrary, they appear to mean a lot. In fact, to the inexperienced listener, they make the speaker sound as wise as Warren Buffett (who, to his credit, never speaks this way).  The phrases are often inscrutable to lay viewers, leaving them with the impression that, if they don’t understand what the guest has just said, it’s because they’re just too stupid to understand.

Most of these phrases also have another key benefit, which is especially useful in the investment business: They never commit the speaker to any specific recommendation or prediction.

In other words, no matter what happens after the guest removes his or her makeup and returns to their office, they can never be “wrong”–because they didn’t actually say anything!

Over the next few weeks, I am going to outline these phrases, when the “smart” experts use them, why it’s smart sounding and why it’s meaningless to you.

 

Top Performing Funds

No One Ever Prints a Magazine Cover With NEXT Year’s Top Performing Funds.

Have you noticed, not even the mutual fund companies or brokerage companies know what funds or stocks are going to do well next year.

If they did, they wouldn’t NEED hundreds of funds and managers.

Think about it: The companies would only need to have ONE predictably sound mutual fund. They don’t.

They hedge their bets and create multiple products for you.

In reality, they have no idea what their so-called “experts” will produce. I call it the “law of large numbers.”

If you have have enough funds available, chances are some of them will do well.

If they don’t do well, the companies will close or merge their funds. This is so they only have to show you the best results.

It’s called “survivorship biased” and it’s a tactic to keep you invested with the same company.

There are much better ways to invest. To find out, it starts with a good read.

Download my FREE Investors Awareness Guide right here on our website and find out what you can do.

To your investing success.

Increase Returns Without Luck

What if you could increase your investment returns more than 200% by simply understanding the role of luck versus skill in investing? If ever there was information the securities industry didn’t want you to have, this is it.

Several recent studies have demonstrated conclusively that almost every mutual fund that outperforms the market is just lucky. No investment skill is evident. The same can be said for brokers and other “investment pros” who claim to be able to time the markets, pick outperforming stocks or select mutual funds that will outperform other funds.

One study, discussed in an article in The New York Times, looked at the performance of 2,100 actively managed funds over a 31-year period. The highly credentialed authors of this independent study concluded that only 0.6% of the fund managers studied had genuine stock picking ability – a number which is statistically indistinguishable from zero.

A recent study by business professors Eugene F. Fama of the University of Chicago and Kenneth R. French of Dartmouth, Luck versus Skill in the Cross Section of Mutual Fund Returns, looked at the effect of luck in the performance of actively managed funds. When luck was excluded, the authors concluded as follows: “Going forward, we expect the remaining 97% of the active fund universe to perform worse than comparable efficiently managed passive funds.”

A study released by Dalbar in March 2010 found that, during the 20 years from 1990 through 2009, the average stock fund investor earned returns of only 3.17% per year, while the S&P 500 returned 8.21%. On an inflation adjusted return, the average equity fund investor increased to only $108,743 on the value of a $100,000 investment made in 1990, while the inflation adjusted growth of $100,000 invested in the S&P 500 would have been $281,979.

The reason for the poor returns of the average stock fund investor is the inability to distinguish between luck and skill. These investors chase returns, relying on brokers and advisers who tell them they can “beat the markets.” They persuade them of their ability to do so by pointing to past returns and implying those returns will persist in the future. They might, if they were based on the skill of investment manager. They don’t, because virtually all of those managers were just lucky.

Once you understand the mesmerizing — but misleading — attribution of skill to results in which luck was the prime factor, you will fundamentally change the way you invest.

You can turbocharge your returns.

Start by downloading my FREE Investor Awareness Guide right here on our website.

To your investing success!

Which Investment Company Is Best For You?

During these times of economic and financial difficulty, many investors often ask themselves some of these questions:

-Am I investing with the right company?
-Am I investing with the right financial advisor?
-Does my advisor have access to the ‘best’ information?
-How do I know that I’m in the right investments?
-Is there some advisor who is better or more informed?
-Shouldn’t my advisor be able to beat the market?

These, and other similar questions, will always be asked by investors. Investing brings with it uncertainty and anxiety. It also brings possible hope.

When investors get upset enough, they often change companies or advisors hoping that “this time it will be better.”

This is a fruitless effort unless investing philosophy changes.

Allow me to take a variation of the last question I just proposed:

If an active manager can gather information and gain insight or knowledge through research into a company, shouldn’t he be able to beat the market?

Answer: Not necessarily.

You and I could have a different set of information or a different interpretation of the same information, while other investors may have no information at all.

However, neither of us is at an advantage or disadvantage because the aggregate of all information is already contained in prices.

So, rather than gaining insight or knowledge, the manager is simply gathering information the market has already digested.

One way to look at it is that in order to beat the market with skill rather than luck, you don’t just need to have more information and insight than the “average” investor. You theoretically need to have more information and insight than all investors combined.

An active manager has only two arrows in his quiver—market timing and stock picking.

All nuanced forms of active management ultimately boil down to some combination of these two elements. Both fundamentally rely on predicting the future, and the information presented in support of the forecast is typically quite compelling.

Statements are made such as “we think the price of oil will rise because . . .” or “we think the economy will recover next year because. . . .”

No matter how convincing the case may seem, however, you should always ask why this information that is readily available to the market would not already be reflected in prices.

Conclusion: Investing doesn’t come down to the best manager, the best company or the best advisor, it always comes down to knowing and picking your investment philosophy…and sticking with it.

To learn more, download a FREE copy of my Investor Awareness Guide right from our website.

To your investing success!

Leave Your Ego At The Door

To be a successful investor you must find a way to eliminate ego from the process.

Ego can make you slow to accept that they way you invested in the past was imprudent and/or wrong.

This makes it nearly impossible to adopt a new and better way.

Every Imprudent Action Requires A Necessary Lie!

A necessary lie is a rationalization to justify self-destructive behavior. Some examples:

“I will start my diet tomorrow…so I will pig out today.”

“One drink won’t hurt…so I will have just one more.”

“I’ll just gamble until I get even…So I will let it ride.”

“This time I really do know what the market is going to do…so it’s all right to speculate with my money.”

To your investing success!

To learn more, download my Investor Awareness Guide for FREE right from my website.

Which Way Will The Market Move Next?

No one knows if the next 20% movement will be UP or DOWN.

However, the next 100% WILL be UP!

Markets fluctuate widely in the short term. Fortunately, every major crash has a recovery, with stocks regaining ALL of their losses, given enough time.

Since 1946 (including 2007-2008) it has only taken the market just 111 days, on average, to rise to its pre-crash levels.

Similarly, while the stock market has seen many 100% gains, it has never suffered a 100% loss.

Arguably, only a global catastrophe such as nuclear war, asteroid collision, or other extinction-level event could cause such a disaster.

In that case, your portfolio would be the least of your worries.

To learn more, download my Investors Awareness Guide right from our website. It’s FREE!

Stock Markets Are Random

Since stock markets are random – so it’s time to get over it.

If you invest in the stock markets, no one can “save” you from the down periods – NO ONE!

If markets were not random and unpredictable, they wouldn’t offer higher expected rates of return. Markets randomly and unpredictably go up and down.

So that always answers the question, “can anyone forecast the future of the market?” It’s obvious that many will claim they can, but the fact is, NO ONE can predictably and consistently forecast what’s going to happen next. If they did it accurately, why would they tell you?

Why are there those that will claim they can forecast the market? It’s simple – so you will buy into their “hype”.

When forecast is involved, who makes the money? You guessed it – the forecasters!

To learn more, download a copy of my Investor Awareness Guide right here!

Stock Market Predictions

Make Enough Predictions and Something is Bound to Come True.

Stock market analysts, magazines and newspaper publishers are infamous for making a huge number of predictions about the future…

Which stocks are going to do well, what the economy will do, or where the market is going.

Because of the vast number of predictions, some of them are always going to become realities.

In future publications the soothsayers will only mention forecasts that happened and selectively “forget” forecasts that failed; leaving the investor with the illusion that the forecast as a shole was accurate and useful.

Be aware of the headlines on television, radio, and in the print. The facts are that most people (including professionals) cannot predict the market.

For a more prudent and Nobel-Prize Winning way to sesnsible investment strategies, read my Investor Awareness Guide. It will answer many of the question you have about investing.

Download my Investor Awareness Guide right here on our website.